Take Part and Develop Software Amiga OS! | page 1 2
|
---|
|
---|
| | Peeri the Sunlight
Posts 72 14 Apr 2018 23:04
| Is there any estimation when Vampire machine language programming guide and SDK will be ready? - spec of AMMX and new instructions. - memory map of SAGA registers - guidelines of programming 080 - Opcodes of new instructions - expansion ports etc, pamela... Just a text/pdf file for printing of docs. Amiga guide would be nice addition. HTML in heavy platform -- no thanks... (need to be Amiga friendly!)
| |
| | Gilles Dridi
Posts 52 10 Oct 2019 19:17
| Is there a preferred SDK ? AmigaOS3.5 AmigaOS3.9 ? AmigaOS3.1.4 ?? No documentation at all for AROS ... Thank(s)
| |
| | Jamie Gilbert
Posts 1 10 Oct 2019 19:26
| Do we have a software package manager for VAMPIRE? Would be ideal if you want to push developers into writing software for it.
| |
| | Vojin Vidanovic (Needs Verification) Posts 1916/ 1 10 Oct 2019 19:30
| There are os3.5 and os3.9 sdks. Vamp instructions in assembly can be found at instructions sections at top of this page. Ammx instructions are as same as Intel x86 mmxPackage manager as apt update no, but see Grunch and AmiUpdate at Aminet. Since Classic was abandoned by Amiga Inc and Hype around 2000-2005, only user made solutions on aminet and Aros exec can save the day
| |
| | Olaf Schoenweiss
Posts 690 11 Oct 2019 08:26
| that is not true that there is no documentation regarding aros EXTERNAL LINK https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Aros/Developer/Docs#AROS/AmigaOS_APIs_and_Docsand EXTERNAL LINK and of course you can add any amiga library
| |
| | Wawa T
Posts 695 11 Oct 2019 12:59
| other than that aros is meant to be compatible with the genuine os. si if the extra functionality doesnt need to be taken into account, the genuine developer documentation will be appropriate to get along.
| |
| | Manfred Bergmann
Posts 235 11 Oct 2019 17:52
| It would be great if more higher level languages could make use of the Vampire features. I'm thinking about AmigaE, AMOS, BlitzBasic/AmiBlitz.I'm not so much an assembler hacker and C I try to avoid. Much too slow feedback loop.
| |
|