Latest Minibench Overview | page 1 2 3
|
---|
|
---|
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6254 07 Apr 2016 22:12
| CARD Total-Score ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACA620 68020 @16 4 * FPGA ARCADE TG68 @ 9 ** ACA1231 68030 @41 11 *** Blizzard 68030 @50 11 *** AMIGA4000 68040 @25 13 *** AMIGA4000 68040 @40 25 ****** MK2 68060 @66 65 **************** VAMPIRE2 SILVER2 x15 140 ***********************************
Here is a nice online page showing graphs EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | John William
Posts 570 07 Apr 2016 23:41
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| CARD Total-Score ----------------------------------- ACA620 68020 @16 4 * FPGA ARCADE TG68 @ 9 ** ACA1231 68030 @41 11 *** Blizzard 68030 @50 11 *** AMIGA4000 68040 @25 13 **** MK2 68060 @66 65 **************** VAMPIRE2 SILVER2 x15 140 ***********************************
|
Nice :D
| |
| | Mr-Z EdgeOfPanic
Posts 189 08 Apr 2016 05:34
| Very nice!!
| |
| | Roger Andre Lassen
Posts 150 08 Apr 2016 08:26
| Sweet :)
| |
| | Marlon Beijer
Posts 182 08 Apr 2016 13:09
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| Here is a nice online page showing graphs EXTERNAL LINK |
I will be adding more graphs for all the different tests during the benchmark too. flype and I are working on a better format so it's easier for me to parse and present the data! :)
| |
| | Marlon Beijer
Posts 182 10 Apr 2016 17:09
| We have now moved the benchmark results to a subdomain of apollo-accelerators.com, you can now find it here: EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6254 14 Apr 2016 20:12
| Update : graphic showing bar added. We plan a HIGH-END Accelerator with roughly 3 times the current performance. With around 400 Points Performance Score. So in the order of 68060@ 400 MHz performance result.As reminder 68030@50 scores 11 points. This new Apollo accelerator will therefore deliver a speed in the order of 1800 MHz 68030. But the accelerator will have significant higher price. What do you think about this?
| |
| | Ole Eitels
Posts 21 14 Apr 2016 22:07
| Sounds intriguing. Personally i would rather see this come to fruition as a stand alone MATX/ITX board, instead of still being dependent on the old machines.
| |
| | Gregthe Canuck
Posts 274 14 Apr 2016 22:38
| High end sounds good. Could you provide a bit more detail on: - what do you mean by significant? Twice the price? 5 times? - the FPGA you plan to use - the memory type/speed you plan to use (different from V2?) Thanks
| |
| | Daniel Sevo
Posts 299 14 Apr 2016 22:55
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| Update : graphic showing bar added. We plan a HIGH-END Accelerator with roughly 3 times the current performance. With around 400 Points Performance Score. So in the order of 68060@ 400 MHz performance result. As reminder 68030@50 scores 11 points. This new Apollo accelerator will therefore deliver a speed in the order of 1800 MHz 68030. But the accelerator will have significant higher price. What do you think about this?
|
Could you provide a "ballpark figure" for price compared to current board? Not sure what your idea of significantly higher price is ;-) Also, depends if it would be...say a 1200 version or standalone version? I imagine a 1200 version would still be "significantly cheaper" ;-) than a standalone board, simply since the standalone board would most likely require a different manufacturing process and contain a lot more componets for I/O? Personally I would buy a V1200 for ~€350-400 if it would give 400MHz 060 performance.
| |
| | Thierry Atheist
Posts 644 14 Apr 2016 23:26
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| But the accelerator will have significant higher price. What do you think about this?
|
Hello Gunnar!!For a genuine AMIGA computer, no price is "too high".... Well, how (nose bleed) high are we talking, anyway? Regardless. I bought a, 7.12 MHz, 68000 ECS chipset 1 Meg RAM (all chip) Amiga 2000 For $2,000 (+ 12% tax) Canadian in 1989. Monitor, extra $500 + tax (it was mono, stereo would have been another $50). (Later, 1990, I spent another $560 for 8 megs of RAM and I needed the GVP SCSI card to put it on, another $300.) EVERYONE ELSE has similar stories to tell. This computer, Apollo Core AMIGA, that you offer today, "400" MHz, "68060 (and then some)" S-AGA 1 Gig RAM (maybe 2?) Well, then.... What can I say? That is equivalent to ~$100,000 in today's money (need an Apollo Core computer to calculate the total amount of money that it would, in fact, be). So throw an amount at us.... We're all "big boys" here. And no one's leaving, that's for sure! (Yes, you've got us right where you want us ;-) .) I'm sure what you've got is cheap, and are offering "PRICELESS" in return. P.S. Don't for a moment compare what our costs are to MASS PRODUCED merchandise by competitors, like super/duper smartphones(watches)/tablets/laptops by Samsung, Raspberry Pi or others' offerings... Their merchandise is not what we want and never ever will be able to do what you have created.
| |
| | Thierry Atheist
Posts 644 14 Apr 2016 23:43
| In conclusion to my rant; some people (me) will buy it!!!!
| |
| | Captain Zalo
Posts 71 15 Apr 2016 00:03
| Ole Eitels wrote:
| Sounds intriguing. Personally i would rather see this come to fruition as a stand alone MATX/ITX board, instead of still being dependent on the old machines.
|
This. And for just such a motherboard, I guess 500-and-some US$ would be within tolerable limits for myself. For just such a standalone board. ITX form factor would be great. Taxes would be a bitch, but who cares? :-)
| |
| | Amiga 4Life
Posts 105 15 Apr 2016 00:53
| if this is a 'Flagship' you better sign me up for 2...this could be a must have for hardcore users willing to push the concept regardless of cost... Classic Amiga is fine a choice. This will force the team to push for a better standalone system....keep in mind Natami is like a fully loaded Amiga 4000 with extras...
| |
| | Ulf Andersson
Posts 29 15 Apr 2016 05:32
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
| Update : graphic showing bar added. We plan a HIGH-END Accelerator with roughly 3 times the current performance. With around 400 Points Performance Score. So in the order of 68060@ 400 MHz performance result. As reminder 68030@50 scores 11 points. This new Apollo accelerator will therefore deliver a speed in the order of 1800 MHz 68030. But the accelerator will have significant higher price. What do you think about this?
|
Well, If this option is with USB, i'm willing to pay aprox 500 USD for it.
| |
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6254 15 Apr 2016 07:00
| gregthe canuck wrote:
| High end sounds good. Could you provide a bit more detail on: - what do you mean by significant? Twice the price? 5 times? - the FPGA you plan to use - the memory type/speed you plan to use (different from V2?) Thanks
|
The plan is the create the world fastest FPGA based CPU card. Our idea includes Apollo-CPU with speed grade ~ 400 MHz 68060 Internal CPU caches of size Icache=64KB / DCache=256KB 1024 MB DDR3 Memory at 1600MHz DIGITAL-VIDEO with Truecolor and FullHD SDCard SATA-Interface As price we target 500 Euro
| |
| | Thierry Atheist
Posts 644 15 Apr 2016 08:53
| $563.22 US For me, $720.42 Canadian.At that price, I will get 2, trying and hoping to save up enough for 3. Both would be for an A1200. I have an A2000 as well. Might get one for that computer too, otherwise, hoping for a standalone. Thank you to all of the Apollo Core developers!!!!!!!
| |
| | Ole Eitels
Posts 21 15 Apr 2016 08:58
| At that price i really hope this is going to be made and sold inside the EU. If not, the total cost with customs, import taxes, and shipping from abroad is going to be too steep.
| |
| | Brian Robotham
Posts 52 15 Apr 2016 13:37
| and what about the people who dont live inside the EU, what about them ?. Taxes are a fact of life, you will still have to add 19 - 25% for taxes if purchased inside the EU depending on country
| |
| | Nixus Minimax
Posts 416 15 Apr 2016 14:09
| Brian Robotham wrote:
| and what about the people who dont live inside the EU, what about them ?. Taxes are a fact of life, you will still have to add 19 - 25% for taxes if purchased inside the EU depending on country |
I'm not sure taxes and customs make a difference here. If you produce and sell the card inside the EU, the vendor would still have to charge VAT as the receiver inside the EU is not an entrepreneur. If the card is produced outside the EU, the receiver will have to pay import tax. In the end the customer will have to pay, one way or the other.
| |
|