|
---|
| | Gunnar von Boehn (Apollo Team Member) Posts 6254 25 Jul 2017 22:22
| We did some rederings on the latest VAMPIRE/CORE Here are the time results for comparison: Used program: Cinema4D 4.2 (CU #27) Installed the 020 Integer version of the program. Glasletter 320x240 = time 1:17 min Glasletter 640x480 = time 4:59 min Colortext 320x240 = time 0:28 min Colortext 640x480 = time 1:36 min
| |
| | Keith Dumoulin
Posts 13 25 Jul 2017 23:19
| Amiga 1200 NTSC GVP 030@50 with 68882@50 AGA 16 meg fast 020 version Glasletter 320x240 = time need to retest FPU version Glasletter 320x240 = time 12:08 Glasletter 640x480 = time 124.44 min A4000 68060 @ 66 A3660 64 meg ram FPU version Glasletter 320x240 = time 2.11 min Glasletter 640x480 = time 18:45 min Colortext 320x240 = time 1:32 min Colortext 640x480 = time 3:23 min For Fun i did same tests with SAM 460 PPC Glasletter 640x480 = time 1:35 min Colortext 640x480 = time 0.36 min
| |
| | Claudio Guglielmotti (Apollo Team Member) Posts 185 26 Jul 2017 10:29
| I tried to render Glassletters on my amiga 4000/040@25mhz, here are the results: AB glass 320x240 to 4096colors = 7:50 (fpu1) AB glass 320x240 to 4096colors = 7:54 (fpu2) AB glass 320x240 to 4096colors = 11:40 (integer)
| |
| | Cunn Pole
Posts 29 26 Jul 2017 10:38
| This might be an interesting benchmark for the progress on the Soft FPU. Anyone care to post the FPU version results for Vampire?
| |
| | M Rickan
Posts 177 27 Jul 2017 01:56
| Cunn Pole wrote:
| This might be an interesting benchmark for the progress on the Soft FPU. Anyone care to post the FPU version results for Vampire?
|
Or perhaps even the same tests using the integer version. Apples to apples...
| |
| | Keith Dumoulin
Posts 13 28 Jul 2017 12:49
| Amiga 1200 NTSC GVP 030@50 with 68882@50 AGA 16 meg fast 020 version Glasletter 320x240 = time 26:22 Glasletter 640x480 = time 1:43:23 Colortext 320x240 = time testing 10:16 min Colortext 640x480 = time testing 35.17 min
| |
| | Keith Dumoulin
Posts 13 02 Aug 2017 02:02
| Amiga 1200 NTSC GVP 030@50 with 68882@50 AGA 16 meg fast 020 version Glasletter 320x240 = time 26:22
| |
| | Benutzer A4K
Posts 24 02 Aug 2017 17:56
| Amiga 4000, CSMKII @122MHz (Oxypatcher not installed): Colourtext, C4D 060fpu, 640x480, no AA: 1:30 Colourtext, C4D 020int, 640x480, no AA: 1:53 Colourtext, C4D 060fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 23:33 Colourtext, C4D 060fpu, Oxypatcher @ 124MHz, AA 4x4: 19:28Olli.
| |
| | Peter Heginbotham
Posts 214 23 Oct 2017 11:32
| any chance of running the test again using the FPU version and the new 2.7 core
| |
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 23 Oct 2017 15:12
| Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, no AA: 1:20 Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 19:59 Gold 2.7 @ 85MHz / femu 0.11-WIP EXTERNAL LINK EXTERNAL LINK EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| | Martin Soerensen
Posts 232 23 Oct 2017 15:51
| Nice, so basically identical speed to '060fpu, Oxypatcher @ 124MHz'. :-)
| |
| | Benutzer A4K
Posts 24 23 Oct 2017 18:53
| Simo Koivukoski wrote:
| Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 19:59 Gold 2.7 @ 85MHz / femu 0.11-WIP |
Very cool femu! It means I have to fiddle more now. Olli.
| |
| | Benutzer A4K
Posts 24 27 Oct 2017 20:45
| Fiddled: Colourtext, C4D 060fpu@128, 640x480, AA 4x4: 18:16EXTERNAL LINK Olli.
| |
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 11 Nov 2017 20:22
| Colourtext, C4D 080fpu@92, 640x480, AA 4x4: 15:42 Gold 2.7 @ 92MHz / femu 0.11-WIP EXTERNAL LINK
| |
|
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 09 Oct 2018 18:54
| Amiga 4000, CSMKII @122MHz (Oxypatcher not installed): Colourtext, C4D 060fpu, 640x480, no AA: 1m30s Colourtext, C4D 060fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 23m33sV500 Gold 2.11: Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, no AA: 0m56s Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 14m55s
| |
| | Simo Koivukoski (Apollo Team Member) Posts 601 08 Jul 2019 21:37
| Vampire Standalone x16: Colourtext, C4D 080fpu, 640x480, AA 4x4: 11m17s
| |
| | Saladriel Amrael
Posts 166 09 Jul 2019 07:36
| Twice as fast as a 122Mhz 060? That's impressive!BTW: didn't know you could overclock a MK2 up to that frequency
| |
|