| Some Test With LightWave Vampire CPU Vs 040 Fpu | page 1 2
|
|---|
|
|---|
| | 
Stefano Briccolani
Posts 495
25 Mar 2018 09:44
| Someone have tested the videotoaster cd
EXTERNAL LINK On vampire?
With toasterless switcher should work
EXTERNAL LINK
Toaster cd contains the video-switcher, ToasterPaint (sort of digi-paint 4), toaster Character Generator, ChromaFX and Lightwave 3d (4.0 and 5.0).
| |
| | 
Pedro Cotter
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 271
07 May 2018 11:21
| The Polish Amiga Forum updated the LW 3.5 Benchmark results table. https://www.ppa.pl/forum/strefa-tworcow/28440/raytracing-i-amiga/32#m609895
| |
| | 
Vojin Vidanovic
Posts 1699
07 May 2018 11:31
| Pedro Cotter wrote:
|
The Polish Amiga Forum updated the LW 3.5 Benchmark results table.
|
7.33x 040/25+FPU (A3640) for 85Mhz V2 Vamp! Great way from 0.14 we started with FEMU!
And Intel Atom emulation speed is next stop! Toughest in real h/w category!
| |
| | 
Andy Hearn
Posts 319
14 Jun 2018 12:19
| So some back of the envelope excel sheets give me an average of 0.616326 "Jubimarks" per clock multiplier for a Vamp2.
for a vamp2 to beat an atom N450, it'd have to have a theoretical x19 clock speed. Maybe the V4 with it's - from what I've seen - potential x16 clock, and other hardware improvements - faster ram etc. could be enough to make the difference...i'd be curious to see what UAE on ARM/Pi3 could do in the Jubimark test...
| |
| | 
Renaud Schweingruber
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 336
24 Jun 2018 21:31
| World fastest Amiga result :-)
Vampire with Full-FPU
| |
| | 
Gregthe Canuck
Posts 274
24 Jun 2018 23:27
| Nice!
What clock speed? x13?
| |
| | 
Gunnar von Boehn
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 4857
25 Jun 2018 07:17
| gregthe canuck wrote:
|
Nice!
What clock speed? x13?
|
Yes this was a Core with x13.
| |
| |
Stefano Briccolani
Posts 495
25 Jun 2018 08:29
| Gunnar von Boehn wrote:
|
gregthe canuck wrote:
|
Nice!
What clock speed? x13?
|
Yes this was a Core with x13.
|
This is the FPU for cyclone5, I suppose (Renaud said Full-Fpu). Am I wrong?
| |
| |
Gregthe Canuck
Posts 274
25 Jun 2018 11:49
|
Going from x12 to x13 probably shaved a few minutes off the time, leaving roughly 5 minutes due to other core boosts. That is almost a 10% performance improvement in this test.That's a big change. Again. Kudos to the core developers. :)
| |
| |
Vojin Vidanovic
Posts 1699
25 Jun 2018 12:23
| gregthe canuck wrote:
|
Going from x12 to x13 probably shaved a few minutes off the time, leaving roughly 5 minutes due to other core boosts. That is almost a 10% performance improvement in this test.
That's a big change. Again. Kudos to the core developers. :)
|
Demo of v4 has displayed ~x14 speed. I hope we can expect that to be what is x11 now. Surely, Kudos for that. Finally, a 100Mhz Amiga in Amiga ways!
| |
| |
Pedro Cotter
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 271
16 Jul 2018 17:53
| Gold 2.10 x12 results:
50:39sEXTERNAL LINK
Previous results:
EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| |
Pedro Cotter
(Apollo Team Member)
Posts 271
15 Jun 2019 17:09
| No Oxipatchers, no HSMATH libs, no tricks!!!
Pure 68080 CPU Power!!!!Render time: 35m 32s EXTERNAL LINK
| |
| |
Vojin Vidanovic
Posts 1699
15 Jun 2019 21:24
| Congrats, its nice having Overclocked Vampire V4 running at x16 (113 MHz) :-) Surely, one can sing a lot of Queen songs!
My choice is Dr Ring Ding & Senior All Stars, where "sound powa" is here m68k raw power :)
EXTERNAL LINK
For early adopters and beta testers "Test My Sound" :)
EXTERNAL LINK
German speaking part of crew are promoted to Music Monks
EXTERNAL LINK
French speaking part of the crew gets Mon Sound
EXTERNAL LINK
and Bosnian one gets Dubioza & Volio BiH Fiesta style
EXTERNAL LINK
| |
|
| | 
Markus B
Posts 196
03 Jun 2020 15:37
| What about the current core of the V4? Any improvements there?
| |
|
Performance and Benchmark Results!